CASE 109 - "JANE"

Overview:  Jane’s case is an example of how inappropriate it is for Government and semi-Government bodies to force people to be vaccinated under threat of failing in studies, of not being employed (such as many nursing students), or being demoted or moved to positions that they do not want, especially when a safe and comparably effective option is available. The improvement Jane made following the vaccine potency makes it clear that the vaccine was the cause. It also shows how usually effective treatments can be of limited value if the true cause of a problem is not removed. Finally, it shows that conventional medical tests will frequently not show any problems following vaccine damage, despite the obvious fact that the patient is unwell.

Click to open case


Overview:  Jessica’s case is very instructive in demonstrating how few doctors in Australia are prepared to acknowledge vaccine damage, even when the facts are unambiguous. Such an attitude is of course not only unscientific, it is fundamentally dishonest. This case also shows how symptomatic treatment is often helpful, but not sufficient to finish off a case when the true cause of the disturbance has not been treated.

Click to open case


Overview:  Daniel’s case shows how a situation which began within 20 minutes of vaccination, and continued for 5 months leading to the consultation, can respond to potencies of the vaccine. With hindsight, Daniel would probably have made quicker progress if I had begun with a lower potency of the DPT (to lessen possible reactions) and had given more frequent remedy repetitions.

We also keep these watches entire brands: audemars piguet,bell & ross,breguet,breitling,bvlgari,cartier,chopard,replica watches,corum, franck muller, hublot,longines,montblanc,movado,omega,patek philippe,iwc,panerai,porsche design, rado,richard mille, roger dubuis, rolex, tag heuer,tissot,u-boat,ulysse nardin,versace,glashutte,graham jaeger lecoutre etc.

Click to open case